This slim volume investigates the young Radical Coleridge’s Sonnets on Eminent Contemporaries in the context of classical rhetoric, genre transformation, democratic ideology and the political history of the Romantic Period. The Neoclassical critics of the Romantic poets, of Coleridge and Keats in particular, denied their “Jacobin” adversaries knowledge of Greek and Latin, and in fact of the whole Classical Tradition. They denigrated them as adventurous, traitorous, godless, low-born, uneducated innovators and dilettantes in art as well as politics, thus giving them a negatively defined group identity that does not stand up in the face of the facts. Coleridge was not a poet of higher social rank educated in a traditional English public school. Though born a pauper Coleridge had learned Greek and Latin at Christ’s Hospital (together with Charles Lamb and before Leigh Hunt), had read and even written Greek poetry, and had a better grounding in and knowledge of the Classical Tradition than many of his Tory critics and advocates of Romantic Period Neoclassicism. To Tory eyes he was a man from and friend of the people, a despicable revolutionary rabble-rouser from the gutter. But, like the other Romantics, Coleridge made free use of the Classical Tradition to conform to the Romantic ideals of “originality” and “young genius”.
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1866-5381.2012.02.33 |
Lizenz: | ESV-Lizenz |
ISSN: | 1866-5381 |
Ausgabe / Jahr: | 2 / 2012 |
Veröffentlicht: | 2012-12-14 |
Um Ihnen ein optimales Webseitenerlebnis zu bieten, verwenden wir Cookies. Mit dem Klick auf „Alle akzeptieren“ stimmen Sie der Verwendung von allen Cookies zu. Für detaillierte Informationen über die Nutzung und Verwaltung von Cookies klicken Sie bitte auf „Anpassen“. Mit dem Klick auf „Cookies ablehnen“ untersagen Sie die Verwendung von zustimmungspflichtigen Cookies. Sie haben die Möglichkeit, Ihre Einstellungen jederzeit individuell anzupassen. Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.